DACA – some facts you may not have gotten from the MSM.

When it comes to immigration, I have some personal biases like most Americans. As the son of a naturalized immigrant father, I favor legal immigration. However, I want a secure border, an end (as near as possible) to illegal immigration, no “chain immigration,” and better criteria for admission among those who we allow to immigrate. However, while I eschew “amnesty” and voting rights, I favor leniency for those illegals who have been in the US for long periods of time without having committed any serious crime (other than illegally crossing our border). Trying to deport upwards of 11 million (possibly upwards of 20 million) illegals is draconian and probably not even technically feasible.

With that preamble, let me turn my attention to the DACA issue (President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program). I do not believe that demographics should decide their fate, but I do believe that the MSM has portrayed the demographics of this group in a way to obfuscate the issue. One of the more obvious favorable portrayals is to call them “Dreamers” – an appellation that sounds so peaceful and beautiful.

[Source: Cutting Through the Media’s Falsehoods About ‘Dreamers,’ by Hans von Spakovsky]

The MSM would have us believe there are only several thousand of these DACA “immigrants” who were carried across our border as babes in arms by the illegal immigrant mothers and that these individuals are fully Americanized. The ones that are shown to us on television have college educations and speak English perfectly. The media further suggests that if they were “deported” they would now have trouble speaking their native language and are all but ignorant of their birth countries’ cultural norms. Thus, we are led to believe returning them to their native lands would be a cruel hardship.

Let’s look at some statistics:

  • Any illegal immigrant was eligible for the program as long as they entered the U.S. before their 16th birthday.
  • Currently there are 690,000 DACA beneficiaries (not just a few thousand).
  • The large majority speak the language of their native countries fluently.
  • The large majority know the culture of their native country intimately.
  • DACA has no requirement of English fluency.
  • The application form actually has a space to list the translator used to complete the form.
  • As many as 24 percent of the DACA-eligible population fall into the functionally illiterate category.
  • Another 46 percent have only ‘basic’ English ability.
  • Only 49 percent of DACA beneficiaries have a high school education, even though a majority are now adults.
  • Military service also qualifies an illegal immigrant for DACA. However, out of the current 690,000 DACA beneficiaries, only 900 are serving in the military.
  • The Obama administration did not check the background of each DACA beneficiary (the law requires that they have no felony convictions and pose no threat to national security).
  • Only a few randomly selected DACA applicants were ever actually vetted.
  • More than 2,100 DACA beneficiaries had their eligibility pulled because of criminal convictions and gang affiliation.

Again, I am not suggesting that we should not make an accommodation for these individuals, but I am saying that overall they will be a burden on American taxpayers, there are a lot more of them than we have been led to believe, and their “development” as “Americans” leaves something to be desired.

Roy Filly

About Roy Filly

Please read my first blog in which I describe myself and my goals.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to DACA – some facts you may not have gotten from the MSM.

  1. Flayer says:

    Even if they were brought here as babes in their mothers’ arms that does not make it my obligation to assist them. i view US citizenship or legal residency a privilege and an asset. If your parents are charged and convicted of a crime they are not allowed to keep the assets of ill gotten gains. Those assets are seized. The children of criminals do not get to keep the house, automobiles and bank account balances. This, the asset of legal residency should not be allowed to flow to the family members of the adult criminal. The DACA “kids” need to take up their legal problems with their parents. i did not do this to them. Their parents did. Let them return to their country of legal citizenship and apply to return after a thorough – and i mean a thorough – vetting. If they ever participated in a rally in which they DEMANDED we do something for them, they are denied. If they ever waved the flag of whatever country they came from, they are denied. It they ever waved the ISIS or hammer-and-sickle flag they are denied. They must speak English. There must not be any record if criminality. I favor deportation as the default with a very few exemplary cases allowed as an exception. The Obama program was unconstitutional on it’s face and the kids can also take up their precarious status with Obama, Democrats and some Republicans who allowed this awful program to happen in their way back to be reunited with their families, living in legal status.

    And i too am the child of 3 times refugee mother who herself was the child of refugee parents. i am also married to a green card legal resident. i grew up living overseas and was taught to respect the visa and legal residency status of our host country. It would NEVEr occurred to us to make any demands of our hosts.

  2. Flayer says:

    Is there no “edit” function in your reply section?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.