Posted with comment.

For the record, I agree with President Trump’s executive order halting the issuance of visas from countries where terrorism is rampant. He could, however, be a little more deliberate in his implementation. But pretty much every important lesson I have learned was through the school of hard knocks. So perhaps our new President learned from the experience.

I have posted this graph previously. In President Obama’s last year the chart below lists the countries from where US immigrants most commonly originated. Four of the most common nations of origin are now on President Trump’s list.


However, we will still need the FBI and National Counterterrorism Center. The chart below shows that most of our terrorist attacks originated through US born or naturalized citizens (so-called “self” radicalized terrorists). The Patriot Act redefined “domestic terrorism” broadening the scope of activities considered a terrorist act (Footnote). Nonetheless, if we could prevent the 40 or so episodes of terrorism by outside actors, then we definitely should. And, is it just me, or does the footnote description of “terrorism” sound a bit like left-wing protesters?


Roy Filly

Footnote: Domestic terrorism as defined by the patriot act:

Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover “domestic,” as opposed to international, terrorism.   A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act “dangerous to human life” that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to:  (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.  Additionally, the acts have to occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States and if they do not, may be regarded as international terrorism.

Section 802 does not create a new crime of domestic terrorism.  However, it does expand the type of conduct that the government can investigate when it is investigating “terrorism.” The USA PATRIOT Act expanded governmental powers to investigate terrorism, and some of these powers are applicable to domestic terrorism.


About Roy Filly

Please read my first blog in which I describe myself and my goals.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Posted with comment.

  1. Robert Lemos says:

    yes indeed!!!!

  2. Bill Conklin says:

    Sure does! I betcha not a single one of the several categories of citizen was a conservative.

  3. David L. Wood says:

    AT last we have a prominent American citizen (not politician) as President who calls the terrorists for what they are and respects his country’s Christianity. He promised to protect our country, and his action so far are proof of that.

  4. Starchild says:

    If some action of yours results in a killer killing somebody on the next block instead of on your block, that is not the same thing as preventing the killing. Talking as if they are the same thing is implicitly saying that the lives of people on the next block don’t matter. When the people on the next block tend to be mostly of a different ethnicity, and when your “solution” involves keeping them out of your neighborhood, don’t be surprised when that kind of talk earns you a reputation for racism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s