The latest brouhaha as the Trump administration begins was the firing of Sally Yates, the Acting Attorney General. There was a Trump mistake involved here. That mistake was appointing someone known to be an activist to be Acting Attorney General as the Democrat Party slow walks the Jeff Sessions nomination through the Senate.
Yates said she would not defend the President’s executive order to ban immigration from nations identified as “countries of concern” under the Obama administration.
[Source: Why Yates Had to Go, Editors, National Review]
[From the editorial] Our Constitution vests all executive power — not some of it, all of it — in the president of the United States. Executive-branch officials do not have their own power. They are delegated by the president to execute his power. If they object to the president’s policies, their choice is clear: salute and enforce the president’s directives, or honorably resign. There is no third way.
Yates, like most Democrats, objects to everything that President Trump is doing. That’s OK. She can resign. But she is not supposed to be selling the Democrat Party side of the argument.
So what was Yates plan: insubordination. From her perspective, what did she have to lose. She would have been dismissed this week or next as soon as Sessions was confirmed. She did not issue this statement on the grounds that the order is illegal. She declined to take a definitive position on that question. Her decision, rather, was based on a desire to go from an unknown bureaucrat to a “champion” of progressive/ statism.
I suspect she was successful in that regard, but, as the saying goes, “Don’t let the door hit you in the *ss when you leave.”