The Great Federal Land Grab.


Progressive/statist/altruists are “all about control” – that is, indeed, where the “statist” portion of the appellation arises. It is truly remarkable how much of the nation’s lands our federal government “controls.”

In just one of Obama’s latest efforts to thumb his nose at Trump and appease the environmental lobby, he used his executive authority to decree two more national monuments, taking 1.65 million more acres of Western land for management by the federal government. The new Bear Ears Buttes monument includes 1.35 million acres of Utah and the Gold Butte monument includes about 300,000 acres in Nevada. That makes a total of 553 million acres of national lands and waters that Obama has repurposed for conservation and protection using the 1906 Antiquities act, more than any other president.

Like the national debt, to which Obama also added more than any other president, the numbers are so large that the average (or even the above average) American cannot comprehend their true magnitude. The amount of land is so vast that it befuddles the mind. If I tell you that the federal government controls 954,000 square miles in just the Western states alone, it is meaningless. It is also meaningless to append that the total acreage adds up to 28% of the nation’s total surface.

Fortunately, I am here to help.

Nothing gives one a grasp of the facts like “a picture worth a thousand words.” Here are some pictures of how much of the nation’s lands are controlled by the federal government. The federal government controls more land in the Western states than either private American citizens or the states themselves.

fed-lands-map

 

 

federal_lands

top_10These maps are stunningly effective at bringing home the message. And that message is: Federal land ownership out west is huge.

If you want to know why Obama only took 300,000 acres in Nevada compared to 1.35 million acres of Utah, it is because the federal government already controls nearly 85% of Nevada. Three hundred thousand acres just ices the cake. (Harry Reid is happy. He didn’t really “leave” Washington. Washington, DC owns his state.)

No one that I know of is arguing that the Bear Ears Buttes do not contain precious antiquities worth preserving. There are many stunning and ancient petroglyphs. However, it was totally unnecessary to grab 1.35 million contiguous acres to protect them.

The map below shows which federal agencies control these vast swaths of land. Pay particular attention to California, please.

screen-shot-2017-01-09-at-7-39-25-am

screen-shot-2017-01-08-at-4-18-36-pm

You may be surprised to learn that the National Parks System controls the least amount of these federal lands.

So what about my home state of California? They are preparing to leave the “union.” That will be very difficult for many reasons, not the least of which is that American citizens in the remaining states own nearly half of the state (45.3%). Will they “buy it?” That would just about pay off the national debt.

Oh, the laughs we are going to have during the Trump presidency!

Roy Filly

 

Advertisements

About Roy Filly

Please read my first blog in which I describe myself and my goals.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The Great Federal Land Grab.

  1. Starchild says:

    Roy, you started out great. First you correctly condemn Obama’s big land grab, and tell us how shocking it is that the federal government (them, not us!) controls so much land. And you’re right. It’s unconstitutional, and a clear indicator of an out of control government.

    But then you tell us how you’ll be laughing during the Trump presidency because of stuff like the fact that “American citizens” (what happened to the land-greedy Feds?) owning nearly half of California will make it difficult for California to become independent.

    This is typical of too many conservatives. You talk like you believe in limited government – until you think Big Government is helping to promote YOUR agenda (whatever it happens to be in that particular case), and then your limited government principles go right out the window! Suddenly the Feds owning all that land is just a laughing matter, because it might prevent people you disagree with politically from exercising their rights to self-determination.

    • Roy Filly says:

      OK. So “the federal government” owns nearly half of California. How does a secession vote deal with that? Buy it back? “Fight” for it? Please enlighten us.

  2. Pat says:

    Looking at my state (Oklahoma) and the controlling agencies, the Forest Service has several square miles in Western Oklahoma. Having been through that area (very flat and tree deficient), I checked an official forestry map. The are no firests in that part of Oklahoma!

  3. David L. Wood says:

    Is an executive decree the same as an executive order? If so, then perhaps Mr. Trump can issue a counter-executive decree. It looks like one more proof of the Big O’s desire to hamstring energy development and add one more impediment in front of D. Trump.

  4. JAMES D KLEISER says:

    One question I had about, say, The Bears’ Ears usurpation: who owned the land before? Were they compensated? Justly?

  5. Roy Filly says:

    It turns out this is not an easy question to answer. Perhaps another reader has some information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s