Immigrants in the abstract.


As I have written many times I am from an immigrant family. However, like most Americans, even I think about “immigration” in the abstract. Typically you and I do not “break down” immigrants into their country of origin and “the success” of immigrants from any given nation to our nation. We are, after all, a “melting pot.”

Only recently, via the candidacy of Donald Trump, has the issue of immigration taken a front and center role in our national politics. Simply discussing the issue allows people like Hillary Clinton to label me as a “xenophobe.” Well, Secretary Clinton, I am not a xenophobe, but I am a thinking American.

Professor Thomas Sowell recently wrote about Abstract Immigrants in an Abstract World. I found his thoughts illuminating and I believe you will, as well. I will abstract his writings (pun intended).

Why would a country with the world’s largest Jewish population, outside of Israel, admit large numbers of immigrants from countries where hatred of Jews has been taught to their people from earliest childhood?

This question is ultimately not about Muslims and Jews. It is about discussing immigrants in the abstract, rather than in terms of the specific concrete realities of particular immigrants in particular circumstances at a particular time and place — that time being now and that place being the United States of America.

A hundred years ago, when immigration from other parts of the world was a major issue, there was a government study which provided voluminous statistics on how immigrants from various countries performed in American society — economically, educationally and in terms of social pathology.

Today, it would not be considered right — that is, not politically correct — even to ask such questions about immigrants, especially if immigrants were broken down by country of origin. Despite some among the intelligentsia who like to refer to the past as “earlier and simpler times,” it is we today who are so simple-minded as to discuss immigrants as if they were just abstract people in an abstract world, to whom we could apply our abstract principles… there are immigrants from some countries who swell the welfare rolls, while immigrants from some other countries almost never go on welfare. Immigrants from some countries are highly educated — more so than most Americans — while immigrants from other countries have little education and few skills.

America is no longer in a position to simply lump immigrants together. For example, I am a descendant of legal immigrants. The progressive/statist/altruists see themselves as “citizens of the world.” Their “one world” philosophy ignores some very real differences that exist across the globe and national borders. Looking at the “immigration policies” of Europe gives me great pause.

Once our “leaders” admit immigrants we must all deal with the problems, or even disasters, that particular immigrants may cause. American elites who say that we should learn from other countries almost always mean that we should imitate what they have done. But what we need to learn most of all is not to repeat their mistakes.

We need to look at our immigration policies with great care and, as always, “altruism” is a very poor way to run a nation.

Roy Filly

Advertisements

About Roy Filly

Please read my first blog in which I describe myself and my goals.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Immigrants in the abstract.

  1. Legal immigration has been a great boost and gift to this country. Today’s main media discussions of “immigration” conveniently leave out the all-important word “legal.” They, the media and liberal leaders, leave out that most important word because illegal immigration swells their voting numbers and helps to insure their hold on political power. Vetting immigrants and putting time limits on visas helps insure national security as well as assist the nation’s positive population growth. Up to recently, vetting the immigrants took front stage because without it one did not achieve admission to this country. Th ignoring of proper vetting has led to much harm with many criminal elements coming into the US. Giving immediate welfare housing and education to the illegals only increases incentive to cross our borders illegally.

    This “progressive” mess is terrible and must be addressed to the advantage of this country, not to that of the illegal immigrants.

  2. Anne Malcolm says:

    They lump us together as being “anti-immigrant,” when we are anti-illegal. This is why I refer to illegal immigrants as “trespassers.” Very few people will state that they are “pro-trespasser.” As for Muslims I use the words Sharia or Sharia Law or Sharia Folks. Sharia is incompatible with our Constitution which also prohibits accepting foreign laws in our country. If one is against Sharia Law or Sharia Folks then you are not violating our 1st Amendment or be labelled a bigot because it is an ideology that is unconstitutional, incompatible and harmful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s