The Green Movement.

If I were to ask you, “What does the Green Movement mean to you?” Or alternatively, “Describe a member of the Green Party,” I suspect you would describe a person that drives a Volt, recycles, has anti-fracking bumper stickers on their car… and the list could go on interminably.

There are certainly enough “movements” and “parties” with the word “green” included (footnote). What do people in the GREEN Movements and the GREEN Parties want? Really? Do you need to think about it? THEY WANT A GREENER PLANET!

[Source: U.S. Falling Behind Rest Of World In Greening Of The Earth. Investors Business Daily Editorial Board]

A report says Earth is turning greener thanks to carbon dioxide emissions. But America isn’t doing its part. While other countries are pumping out more CO2, the U.S. has cut its output.

Carbon dioxide is the environmentalists’ bogey man. In their narrative, it is an evil gas that, when produced by man, heats the globe to intolerable levels. But CO2 is just part of nature — even when generated by human activities — and it is making the world greener.

According to the study “Greening of the Earth and its Drivers” that appeared in the journal Nature Climate Change, there is “a persistent and widespread increase of growing season integrated LAI (greening) over 25% to 50% of the global vegetated area.”

At the same time, less than 4% of the globe is browning. (Oh, the horror – RF.)

The authors, 32 of them from 24 institutions (they must not be among the 97% of climate scientists that state unequivocally that CO2 is the death knell of Planet Earth – RF), say that “factorial simulations with multiple global ecosystem models suggest that CO2 fertilization effects (man’s emissions) explain 70% of the observed greening trend…”

Despite the report about carbon dioxide emissions’ beneficial effects on our world, the study’s authors felt the need to adopt the environmentalists’ narrative (Oops! They are among the 97% of climate “scientists” that state unequivocally that CO2 is the death knell of Planet Earth – RF) Yes, Earth is greener thanks to CO2, they say in their news release. But they don’t want the global warming contrarians to use the greening to “argue against cuts in carbon emissions to mitigate climate change, similar to those agreed at the 21st Conference of Parties (COP) meeting in Paris last year under the U.N. Framework on Climate Change…”

Of  course not! Why would one use “evidence” instead of “religious conviction.” After all, the climate must be perfect at this moment in Earth history. I mean Earth has been around for 4.5 billion years. But aren’t we the lucky ones – April 29, 2016 is the day of perfection! We wouldn’t want any changes after today!

And thanks to HP for sending this to me.

Roy Filly

List of Green Parties











Czech Republic

Democratic Party of Greens (since 2009)
















New Zealand


Papua New Guinea








South Africa




United Kingdom

United States




About Roy Filly

Please read my first blog in which I describe myself and my goals.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Green Movement.

  1. Change in Climate is constant and has been since the earth’s formation. Man, of course, must adjust to it wherever he is. To think that ‘scientists’ could make a logical argument that man’s industrial output could in some way affect the atmosphere of this planet defies rational knowledge of this earth and its atmosphere. It is estimated that thirty eight percent of the globe’s land mass is uninhabited. Greater in surface area than the land mass is the earth’s coverage by water; i.e., the oceans and lakes. When viewing the enormity of volume of the earth’s atmosphere over our globe, including the poles, one must realize that all of man’s compared puny CO2 output cannot contribute enough even to affect measurable temperature change. Besides, ninety percent of the atmospheric gas is water vapor, not CO2.

    Temperature elevation has not been recorded higher than 0.3 degree by satellite technology for the last several decades. Claims of northern hemisphere melting of glaciers and ice packs is countered by recorded increases of the South Pole’s increase in Ice accumulation.

    The explanation that the warnings of “global warning” must result in higher taxation of and deduction of CO2 output of industry is a political machination, not a scientific conclusion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s