Interesting perspective on Donald Trump.

Dear Readers,

I have written six posts on Donald Trump (see footnote). Most were not very laudatory of his campaign, but I tried to give credit when it was his due. However, I have not drawn a final conclusion about him. This article in the American Thinker has offered a rational perspective. It helped me. Perhaps it will help you.

It was a bit long so I edited out a few paragraphs that I didn’t believe were contributory (or were crude and/or demeaning). You can read the entire article here at your leisure.

And thanks to JM for forwarding this to me.

Roy Filly

Trump’s Trump

G. Murphy Donovan

Donald Trump is a piece of work even by New York standards: tall, white, loud, brash, entrepreneurial, successful, rich, ruthlessly candid,  well-dressed, and fond of heterosexual women. He has married at least three delicious ladies in fact. Trump has five children and seven grandchildren. Indeed, his progeny are well above average too, smartly groomed, photogenic, and successful to boot.

As far as we know, Donald does not have any  tattoos, piercings, unpaid taxes, or under-aged bimbo interns, nor is he a  drinker or a junkie.   Trump projects and enterprises probably employ more folks than the NYC school system — or the United Nations.

You could say that Trump is living the life, not the life of Riley, but more like Daddy Warbucks with a comb over. “The Donald,” as one ex-wife calls him, is not just living the American dream. Trump is the dream — and proud of it.

You could do worse than  think of Trump as upwardly mobile blue collar. He is the grandson of immigrants and the product of Long Island, a Queens household, and a Bronx education. The Donald survived the Jesuits of  Fordham University for two years before migrating to finish his baccalaureate at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.

When readers of the New York Times, The New Yorker, and the New York Review of Books speak of “the city”, they are not talking about the Queens or the Bronx. Growing and schooling in the blue-collar boroughs gives Trump a  curb level perspective, something seldom found in Manhattan. Or as any “D”  Train alumnus might put it, Trump has “a pretty good Bravo Sierra detector.”

So what’s not to like about Donald Trump? He doesn’t just stay in four-star hotels; he builds them. He doesn’t just own luxury condominiums; he makes them. He doesn’t just own historic buildings; he restores them. He doesn’t just eat at the best restaurants; he creates them. He just doesn’t belong to the best country clubs; he builds those too.

And Donald Trump, unlike the Manhattan/Washington fantasy Press and every Beltway political pimp, doesn’t just pay lip service to a bigger and better economy, he creates micro-economies every day.

The only thing we don’t know about Donald Trump is why he would like to immigrate to the District of Columbia.

In any case, the merits of entrepreneurs like Trump might best be defined by the character or motives of his critics. Trump detractors are for the most part “B” list politicians, ambulance chasers, and a left-leaning Press corps that lionizes the likes of Nina Totenberg, Dan Rather, Chris Matthews, Andrea Mitchell, and Brian Williams.

If the truth were told, most of Trump’s critics are jealous, envious of his wealth — and they loath his candor. Donald might also be hated for what he is not. Trump is not a lawyer, nor is he a career politician who lives on the taxpayer dime. Trump is paying for his own campaign. Bernie, Barack, McCain, and Kerry could take enterprise lessons from a chap like Trump.

Unlike most government barnacles, Trump can walk and chew gum at the same time. He knows how to close a deal and build something. He is a net creator, not consumer, of a kind of wealth that provides “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” for Americans — real jobs not feather merchants.

Today, Trump has nothing left to prove. Yet, success has allowed him the rarest of public privileges, an electoral pulpit and the courage to speak his mind. Alas, truth is not necessarily a political asset in a socialized democracy.

Indeed, the erstwhile presidential candidate stepped on his crank recently by suggesting that Mexico, already exporting dangerous drugs, cheap tomatoes, and even cheaper labor, was also exporting violent felons to the US.

Truth hurts! Trump’s rude candor is underwritten by nearly half a million illegal felons in American jails. Coincidently, events have conspired to support Trump’s take on Mexican dystopia with the El Chapo Guzman jailbreak and the murder of Kathryn Steinle by Francisco Sanchez.

Senor Sanchez sported a lengthy criminal record and had been deported on four previous occasions. San Francisco, a “sanctuary” city, failed to honor existing warrants and released Sanchez from jail just before he blew Kathy Steinle away.

… To date, Trump has run a clever campaign. He is chumming, throwing red meat and blood into campaign waters and all the usual suspects are in a feeding frenzy. McCain, the Press, the Left, and the Republican establishment all have something to say about “the Donald.” It is truly amazing how cleverly Trump manages to manipulate the establishment.

If you are trying to sell an idea or a candidacy, there’s no such thing as bad publicity.

Who knows where the Trump campaign goes? For the moment, he has scored direct hits on Mexico… every time a toilet flushes in Sinaloa, Mexican garbage is likely spill out in Los Angeles, Hollywood, San Francisco, Portland, or Seattle. Indeed, it’s hard to believe that the Left Coast could survive without cheap labor, pistileros, meth, coke, heroin, or weed. Necrotic immigration and its byproducts are ready made targets for a gunslinger like Trump.

Trump is no bigot. He probably employs more Latinos and Blacks than Enrique Peña Nieto or Barack Obama. In his own way, Donald Trump is both immigrant and POW, a refugee from Queens and still a prisoner of Wharton… He is the wildly successful capitalist that some of us love to hate.

Before democratic socialism, success and effectiveness were measures of merit. It doesn’t take much insight to compare Trump’s various enterprises with federal programs. Public education, banking oversight, public housing slums, poverty doles, veterans fiascos, Internal Revenue hijinks, and even some Defense Department procurement programs are consensus failures. The F-35 “Lightning” fighter is an illustration, arguably the most expensive single DOD boondoggle in history. Pentagon progressives seldom win a catfight these days, but they still spend like sailors.

If and when Trump fails, he is out of business.

In Trump’s world, failure has consequences.  In contrast, Washington rewards failure with better funding. Indeed, generational program failure is now a kind of perverse incentive for Beltway politicians and apparatchiks to throw good money after failed programs…

Any way you look at it, Donald Trump is good for national politics, good for democracy, good for America, and especially good for candor. If nothing else, The Donald may help Republicans to pull their heads out of that place where the sun seldom shines.

The author had two tours in Vietnam as a junior officer and subsequently served as command intelligence briefer in Hawaii where he updated CINCPAC, John McCain’s father, on POW matters.




About Roy Filly

Please read my first blog in which I describe myself and my goals.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Interesting perspective on Donald Trump.

  1. John Schreiber says:

    “If and when Trump fails, he is out of business”

    This is simply false. I believe he has been bankrupt 4 times (not personally of course) and yet he emerges as a billionaire. He is what is wrong with America. Trump as president is a rubicon that I cannot cross. The RNC – based on his innumerable offensive statements – need to eject him from the Republican Party. I think Cruz is the only republican that could lose to Clinton. If trump is the nominee I believe he will win. If necessary after next Tuesday he and his insane/clueless voters need to be ejected. A ticket of Rubio and Kasich (as annoying as he is) will be a winner.

  2. Dick Toomey says:

    I believe Mr. Schreiber missed the point — or maybe I’m naive — I took that statement to mean — “if he fails,” — period — not if he’s able to succeed in using the bankruptcy laws to get off the mat and try again — something that’s done thousands of times in this country by the most “upright” of people. As far as the rest of the response is concerned, you can have your precious RNC, a political money laundering operation that manipulates who gets in and who gets what. Mr. Schreiber has the temerity to brand Trump supporters as “insane and clueless;” yet denounces Trump for his “offensive statements.” Funny. Or as Carl (Sling Blade) said, “Not funny, ha ha.”

  3. Roy Filly says:

    I posted this piece because emotions on both sides of the “Trump debate” are running strong. I am trying to keep my emotions out of the decision – not easy. I dislike his attacks on other Republicans.I still believe Ronald Reagan’s admonition: Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican.

  4. mganzi says:

    Trump is not like the others for sure. The others try to say what you are thinking and occasionally do; Trump says what many Americans want to say (out loud) but have been imprisoned by the PC culture/police. A master at walking back the tawdry aspects of his unvarnished statements, he has introduced subjects into the discourse of this election which escaped any candidate’s positions until he raised them. Number one is immigration, specifically illegal immigration which robs millions at least two ways: doing unskilled jobs for less and supporting them and their families via our generous welfare programs paid for by us, the taxpayers. Let alone considering that as of the end of 2014, 1/3 of those in are prisons are ‘undocumented.’
    As to November, when you have the left and the mainstream media endlessly telling us Trump can’t possibly win, you know by the flak that you are over the target. Consider that he’s beating or has beaten every single professional politician whom the GOP has offered. Is it then logical to argue that any of them would be a better candidate in the national election? Second string quarterbacks will do better than Peyton Manning in the Super Bowl?

  5. Roy Filly says:

    Interesting perspective. I keep wondering if “free stuff” paid for by someone other than those getting the “free stuff” will prevail.

  6. michael bucalo says:

    Mr. Donovan is no elitist and he is correct.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s